The Bucks have made all kinds of moves this summer, and none of them have looked particularly good for Michael Redd. Re-signing John Salmons, a Redd quasi-replacement, was a start. Then they picked up Corey Maggette via trade, who would certainly hack into the minutes of a healthy Redd. Chris Douglas-Roberts and Keyon Dooling, too, are likely to take over some minutes at shooting guard next season, and even Milwaukee’s moves at other positions — acquiring Drew Gooden, per se — hedge the Bucks’ ever-dwindling need for a guy like Redd on the roster.
Garry D. Howard of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel wrote a column this morning on Redd that reads more like a eulogy, but that’s the Bucks’ reality. Here lies Michael Redd — good scorer, poor defender, and righteous dude. He may have been taken before his time and he may have been paid too much, but he did what he did for as long as he could, and that’s all anyone could ask of him.
Last season, the Bucks waited for Redd. It’s one of the reasons why the team was a bit slow out of the gate before mounting an absolutely ridiculous tear through the first few months of the 2010 calendar year. With a bit of closure on Redd’s status, the rest of the Bucks were set free, and one can only hope that the team’s added depth will have the same effect in the coming season. Too often does the progress of an injured star end up holding a team in limbo, but things are different now. The Bucks don’t need Michael Redd. They may have been able to use him last year, when they struggled to hit 74 points in Game 7 against the Atlanta Hawks, but now his presence is completely superfluous.
That’s for the best. For the Bucks, at least. Redd can take his time with his recovery, he can slowly get back into NBA shape, and he can maybe take over a small role late in the season. But this time, Milwaukee won’t wait up. Andrew Bogut, Brandon Jennings, and Scott Skiles will have this team rolling, and while it would be nice for Redd to be a part of it, that time has passed.