NBA Finals, Lakers Celtics: Lakers must slow down Rondo by cutting down on mistakes

Leave a comment

Thumbnail image for Rondo_drive.jpg

Rajon Rondo can be something of a mystery. In game one, Rondo looked like a relative non-factor. He only grabbed six rebounds, went 6-14 from the field, and totaled a good-but-not-great eight assists. He had his moments, but for the most part it looked like the Lakers had solved the Rondo riddle.
In game two, Rondo exploded for a triple-double. He pushed the ball relentlessly, and took over the stretches of the game when Ray Allen wasn’t making everything he looked at. What did Rondo do differently in game two? Not much. Rondo’s game two was more about what the Lakers did worse than Rondo did better.
Rondo is perhaps the deadliest counter-striker in the NBA. He can hold his own playing pick-and-roll in half-court situations, and is capable of making some beautiful floaters off the dribble, but he can still be contained if teams pack the paint on him and force him to rely on his mid-range jumper. It’s in transition where Rondo becomes a force of nature. To contain Rondo, his opponents must limit the amount of transition opportunities they give to Rondo.
The most obvious way to prevent your opponent from fast-breaking is to keep your turnovers in check, and the Lakers didn’t do a great job of that in game two. After turning the ball over only 12 times in game one, the Lakers made 15 miscues in game two. However, as Yahoo!’s Kelly Dwyer noted earlier today, the Lakers’ increased turnovers weren’t really the story: the Celtics actually got one fewer point off of Laker turnovers than they did in game one.
What really allowed Rondo to get loose in game two was the amount of three-pointers the Lakers missed. The Lakers aren’t a great three-point shooting team, so they should never rely on the three-ball offensively. Against Rondo and the Celtics, settling for threes is a death sentence. 
Nobody is better at grabbing long rebounds and starting the fast break than Rajon Rondo. With his long arms, huge hands, and uncanny ability to know where a long carom his headed, Rondo is a master at grabbing rebounds that go over the heads of the big men crashing the boards. Once he gets the rebound, it’s off to the races: in a recent Ian Thomsen Sports Illustrated cover story on Rondo, the Boston point guard said that a long rebound is “like the first pass on a fast break” to him. 
In game one, the Lakers missed six three-point shots. In game two, they missed 17. Rondo only grabbed two defensive rebounds in game one. In game two, he grabbed eight. Thanks to all those long rebounds, Rondo was able to push the ball. When Rondo pushes, it opens up driving lanes for him. When Rondo pushes, it gets tougher for the Lakers to cross-match. When Rondo pushes, it opens up Ray Allen and Paul Pierce for threes trailing the break. You see where I’m going with this. 
If the Lakers want to contain Rondo in game three, they have to keep him from getting out on the fast break. The best way for them to do that is to pound the ball inside, be patient offensively, and not settle for threes. Against the Celtics, it’s not just a low-percentage shot: it’s a low-percentage shot that leads to high-percentage opportunities for the Celtics. 

Did Cavaliers dropping David Griffin lead to Kyrie Irving’s trade request?

Ronald Martinez/Getty Images
Leave a comment

Cavaliers coach Tyronn Lue said he had the NBA’s hardest coaching job. Following that thinking, former Cavaliers general manager David Griffin might have had the most difficult front-office job.

Not only did he face the same championship-or-bust pressure and oversee the same players (and their egos) as Lue, Griffin also reported directly to Dan Gilbert, the Cavs’ sometimes-difficult owner. The Gilbert aspect is often discussed, as is working with great/brilliant/passive-aggressive LeBron James. But it has probably been undersold how high-maintenance Kyrie Irving – who requested a trade – also was for Griffin before the general manager was ousted last month.

Ramona Shelburne, Dave McMenamin and Brian Windhorst of ESPN:

Over the previous few months, the Cavs had been worried about Irving’s mindset. They knew at times he’d grown unhappy with playing a secondary role on the team. Griffin had several conversations with Irving throughout the year, sources said, trying to find ways to work on the situation.

After the season, there was a desire to arrange a meeting to clear the air from all sides, sources said, but it didn’t take place. Unlike most teams, the Cavs did not have postseason exit meetings with their players.

What followed was a whirlwind, with the Cavs putting forth a series of trade packages looking to acquire either Butler or George. Some of these talks included Irving, which upset him even more when he found out about it, sources said. Previously, Griffin had worked to keep lines of communication with Irving open, but now Irving was in the dark.

Irving’s trade request had been building for years. The reported timing is vague, but Irving might have even requested a trade while Griffin was still in charge.

Either way, there’s no guarantee the Cavs keeping Griffin would have placated Irving. But it seems an experienced voice running the front office could have only helped.

Now, the task of trading Irving or mending fences falls to new general manager Koby Altman – who must solve this issue in a spotlight he never wanted.

If only Cleveland had Phil Jackson to insist on exit meetings. Maybe this would have been smoothed over a month ago.

LaVar Ball gets technical foul, pulls his AAU team off the court, forfeits game it was winning (video)

7 Comments

Magic Johnson said he’s convinced LaVar Ball’s outlandishness is just marketing and that the father of Lakers rookie Lonzo Ball is truly committed to developing younger players.

This didn’t look like someone who put youth player development over his own image.

With LaVar Ball’s AAU team leading by nine, he got a technical foul then pulled his team off the court:

He (kind of) explained why after the game (warning: profanity):

He also touched on his reasons in a video that, of course, quickly turns to promoting his brand:

This doesn’t mean Johnson is completely wrong, but the Lakers president seemingly misdiagnosed Ball’s priorities. What if Johnson is also wrong about Ball staying clear of the Lakers? That could create problems – if it hasn’t already.

I was never convinced, as NBA commissioner Adam Silver predicted, LaVar would settle down after Lonzo was drafted. I still believe Lonzo’s talent justifies managing LaVar, but that appears increasingly likely to be a burden the Lakers must actually handle rather than just brush off.

James Dolan’s MSG threatens to sue Steve Ballmer’s Los Angeles Clippers

2 Comments

This story requires a little background.

The Forum in Inglewood was best known for decades as being both fabulous and the home of the Los Angeles Lakers, back from the Jerry West era and through Magic’s “Showtime” teams. Then in 2001 the Lakers moved downtown to Staples Center, and after that the Forum went through some rough times. It was a number of things, including a mega church for a while, but mostly it was empty. Then several years ago the Madison Square Garden company (owned by Knicks owner James Dolan) bought the Forum, fixed it up, and started booking it again. Now the Forum is one of the hot major concert/event spaces in Los Angeles again, and it’s about to get a boost because it’s adjacent to where Stan Kroenke is building the new Los Angeles Rams stadium. Hello gentrification!

Now enter Steve Ballmer. The Clippers’ owner wants out of Staples Center and the Lakers’ shadow, so he has proposed to build his new arena in Inglewood in another space adjacent to the Rams stadium — land that MSG used to lease. As you might imagine, Dolan’s MSG is not thrilled — they are already battling with Staples to fill their space, now a state-of-the-art arena is moving in down the street.

In a proxy Knicks/Clippers battle, MSG may sue to Clippers and Inglewood in an attempt to block the new building. Here is what Dolan’s attorney in the case, Marvin Putnam, told the Daily Breeze in Los Angeles.

“The mayor made it extremely clear that he needed that piece of land back for a kind of ‘Silicon Beach,’ ” said Marvin Putnam, a partner with the law firm Latham & Watkins, which filed the damage claim that serves as a precursor to a lawsuit. “They’re attempting to flat-out trick people.”

(Inglewood Mayor James) Butts declined to comment, and there is no proof that he made those statements. But when Madison Square Garden Co. relinquished the parking lease to the city, its approved contract states that the land would not be used for anything that would hurt the Forum’s business, according to documents.

Right now the Clippers and Inglewood are in an exclusive negotiating agreement to come to terms on the sale and plans for the property. Putnam told the paper — and the Inglewood City Council — that if the deal goes forward they will sue to block it.

It’s impossible to say how this will turn out, although as a former government reporter I will say these cases tend to be decided in favor of the side about to spend a ton of money on a new building.

 

Jaylen Brown’s #drivebydunkchallenge video is awesome

4 Comments

I love the drive by dunk challenge (if you prefer, the #drivebydunkchallenge), it would be the best thing on NBA Twitter this summer, if it wasn’t for Kyrie Irving.

But the best one yet comes from Boston’s Jaylen Brown.

He steals the ball, and the best part is the guy who comes over like he’s going to stop Brown from throwing it down.

Was it staged… I don’t want to know.