Ted Leonsis is going to make buddies with his NBA owner peers very quickly.
Leonsis spoke to reporters on Friday and said that the NHL (whose Capitals are also owned by Leonsis) is currently “stronger” because their Collective Bargaining Agreement prevents owners from ingesting “stupid pills” as he put them, referring to large contracts which can eat up salary space and sink profits.
Leonsis specifically pointed to the NBA’s soft cap, which allows teams to exceed the salary cap in exchange for a tax on every dollar spent over the limit. NBA ownership is currently considering pushing for a hard cap for next year’s CBA negotiations, something the Player’s Union would outright revolt at, and which would inevitably lead to the lockout. You know the lockout, the one that’s considered inevitable, anyway.
Leonsis coming out swinging for the ownership is sure to make him a few new friends, and certainly the argument is sound. NBA teams with as much revenue as they generate, should not be losing money. And the cap situation has allowed for long term failures of certain clubs. Take the Knicks, who are still feeling the effects of Isiah Thomas’ stupid pills overdose. They surrender their last draft pick to Utah in June’s draft, while finally freeing themselves of the ridiculouslly bloated contracts they managed to pick up over the last decade.
At the same time, one of the best things about the NBA is its fluidity and the soft salary cap makes that possible. If you have an owner willing to spend, it means that you’re more likely to find yourself in contention. Moving to a hard cap is fine, but also may create a chokehold on certain teams in certain markets. This is where the revenue sharing angle comes into play, something the players’ union is adamant about and that big market owners like Leonsis are likely to resist.
Still, at least Leonsis is showing early signs of understanding how you create long-term success, by managing your resources carefully, maintaining flexibility, and making moves for the long-term. That should aid him as he seeks to rebuild the Wizards. You know, once he can figure out how to ditch Gilbert Arenas, who has proven to be a stupid pill so big you can choke on it.
The Bucks reportedly already planned for Greg Monroe to opt in after this season, a reasonable conclusion considering they tried to dump him in a trade all summer and found no takers.
But Monroe has quietly boosted his stock this season. Coming off Milwaukee’s bench, he’s still a skilled interior scorer. But he’s defending and rebounding better, using his quick hands to strip opponents and taking plenty of charges.
Could he even decline his $17,884,176 player option?
Monroe, via Charles F. Gardner of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel.
“I’m not thinking about anything like the off-season right now. There is a time and place for everything. If and when I have to make a decision, that time is not right now.”
The time might approach more quickly than Monroe expects. If the Bucks shop him again, potential trade partners will want to know Monroe’s intention. Some might prefer the flexibility created by him opting out, and others would like the certainty of having a productive player at a reasonable-enough cost next season. But all would want to know where they stand.
That said, it’s hardly a give Milwaukee moves Monroe. Though he has backed up John Henson and Miles Plumlee, Monroe (21.2 minutes per game) plays more than both. He’s a valuable contributor on a team jockeying for playoff position.
Most importantly, Monroe appears to complement Bucks franchise player Giannis Antetokounmpo well. Antetokounmpo scores more (23.5 to 26.3 points per 36 minutes) and more efficiently (59.0% to 65.7% true shooting percentage) from when he plays without Monroe to when he plays with Monroe, and Milwaukee’s offense improves accordingly (104.3 to 114.6 points per 100 possessions).
Stephen Curry is having a down year relative to his last two seasons.
That shouldn’t qualify as a controversial statement. Curry won MVP the last two years. There wasn’t much room to go anywhere but down. Adjusting to playing Kevin Durant has taken time, and Curry might have been due for regression to the mean, anyway. It isn’t as if Curry is having a bad season. He remains a superstar, and I haven’t seen anyone credible unfairly admonish Curry for his production slip.
Yet, the slightest sniff of Curry criticism prompted teammate Andre Iguodala to unload on the media.
Iguodala, via Chris Haynes of ESPN:
“I be like, ‘What are y’all even talking about.’ Like, why? That’s just the world we live in,” Iguodala told ESPN. “It’s like, whatever. You can be on the best team and winning the most games and they’ll try to find something. It’s almost sad because they look for things to say negative. They just look [for] something, anything.”
He blames the media for reaching for a narrative.
“I think they’re just looking for something,” Iguodala continued. “It’s not just that he set the bar so high. I don’t think it’s that. It’s just the hate. That’s just how they’ve been since the beginning of time. And you’re not going to write that, but that’s just how they are. Since the beginning of time, it’s some things that we can do that they can’t do. And they’ve been trying ever since to either try to do it, which they can’t, and they figure that out, and to make us feel less than what we are.”
There is some truth to that. Most media members at one point dreamed of playing in the NBA, and none of us can do it. Otherwise, we would be doing it.
Nearly all of us learned long ago we’d fall far short of playing in the NBA, so I don’t think there’s such a direct jealousy as Iguodala paints. It’s just not something most of us are dealing with.
That said, some reporters can be overly negative for varying reasons. I caution against speaking as broadly as he does, but Iguodala certainly has a right to express his opinion.
Perhaps, Haynes negating Iguodala’s prediction that his comments won’t be written up shows that we’re not all so bad?
Carmelo Anthony told Phil Jackson he wanted to remain with the Knicks.
Anthony holds a no-trade clause and, therefore, all the leverage. He has repeatedly publicly stated his desire to remain in New York, and this was just the latest example of that commitment.
But apparently he’s open to being dealt under the right circumstances.
Anthony, via Al Iannazzone of Newsday:
“I think it will be more on the front office,” Anthony told Newsday this week. “I have the power, but still I would talk to them. We would be in communication if they feel like they want to go in a different direction, they want to start rebuilding for the future. If they tell me they want to scrap this whole thing, yeah, I have to consider it.”
Anthony, 32, made it clear he isn’t thinking about going anywhere, nor does he allow himself at this point. He and his family love it in New York, and his son is in school here.
The Knicks’ fundamental issue: Anthony is 32, and Kristaps Porzingis is 21. Their timelines just offer little to no overlap. New York might be better off building around Porzingis.
But the Knicks have already given lucrative long-term contracts to 31-year-olds Joakim Noah and Courtney Lee. Noah’s deal – worth more than $72 million over four years – is particularly onerous. It would be difficult for New York to pivot into rebuilding – and that starts with Anthony.
He’d like be choosy about where he’d go in a trade, and contenders will be reluctant to part with significant pieces for an aging scorer with few complementary skills. And it’s hard to fit Anthony’s salary, either into cap space or through salary matching, without surrendering key players.
So, there are significant roadblocks to the Knicks ever actually trading Anthony. But that he acknowledges hypothetically accepting a deal means something.
Pelicans general manager Dell Demps has repeatedly failed to build an adequate supporting cast around Anthony Davis, keeping Demps on the hot seat.
Meanwhile, former Hawks and Cavaliers general manager Danny Ferry – still respected in many circles, despite using “African” pejoratively to describe Luol Deng – is working in New Orleans’ front office.
You can see where this is going…
Zach Lowe of ESPN:
Don’t look for Danny Ferry, currently an advisor to the front office, to take over in any shakeup, sources say.
I’m skeptical. Nobody wants to acknowledge an internal coup before it’s executed. Doing so would create a terrible workplace environment until it happens or if it doesn’t.
The Pelicans’ ownership situation makes this a little more tricky. There’s an apparent desire in New Orleans to win quickly for an aging Benson, and that directive has limited Demps’ flexibility.
Still, Demps’ plans have mostly busted. Eventually, he’ll run out of chances to try new ones.
If that happens soon, when the Pelicans search for a replacement, Ferry will be right there with an impressive record building up Atlanta and no stains that make him unhirable to New Orleans. Would the Pelicans, who thought enough of him to hire him once already, really not consider promoting him?