NBA Playoffs Cavs Celtics Game 3: Witness the power of this fully operational elbow

2 Comments

The pendulum swings both ways. Tonight, LeBron James swung it through the Celtics’ fortress walls and left their homecourt advantage in ruins.

James took over in a way we haven’t seen, maybe since his Game 5 performance against the Pistons in 07, completely dominating at both ends of the floor while getting his teammates involved. He outscored the Celtics in the first quarter, en route to a virtuoso 38 points, 8 rebounds, 7 assists, 1 steal, 2 blocks performance that, regardless of your personal leanings, had to leave you breathless.

But it’s hard to give James all the credit, as his team racked up 124 points on only 87 (estimated) possessions. Their efficiency  was incredible, scoring 142.5 points per 100 possessions (estimated). That’s absolutely absurd. The Celtics’ defense, which has been so prolific in the playoffs, was completely overrun, unable to stop anything.

There were several wrinkles the Cavs created with their adjustments in this game. First and foremost, they chose to switch Anthony Parker on Rondo, which, amazingly, was very effective. Rondo had 18 and 8, but had a terrible first quarter with Parker on him, being forced into a long-range and mid-range offensive game, at which he’s still unsteady. By the time Rondo adjusted and started getting aggressive, the outcome was decided.

The Cavs also started using Antawn Jamison (20 points, 12 rebounds) off the cut, instead of in ISO, and the result was phenomenal. Having Jamison curl off screens, getting the ball mid-move, and flip up leaners, runners, and teardrops was much more effective against the bigger Garnett and man-help Celtics defense.

For the Celtics, this was a pretty depressing performance. Paul Pierce (11 points on 4-15 shooting) was an outright disaster. He couldn’t do anything to even slow down James and offensively had no lift or cohesion. Kendrick Perkins was 2-2 for 5 points, and played decent defense on Shaq, though the big man finally wound up getting some production. But Perkins was never given the opportunity to produce, with only two shots. Kevin Garnett was nearly flawless, but only had 11 shots, nailing 8 on turnarounds, hooks, and mid-range jumpers off the pick and pop.

So Paul Pierce shoots 15 shots, Ray Allen shoots 9, and Perkins and Garnett shoot 13 combined. And that pretty much says what you need to know about the Celtics’ offense. But for the pace of the game, the C’s could have lived with the offense. A few tweaks here or there, and that would have been fine. But the defense? The defense was a nightmare.

And in this nightmare, LeBron James was the boogeyman, the Freddy Krueger, the thing that went dunk in the night. Shrugging off the talk of the elbow, James had everything going. The long-range, the transition game (including a give-and-go-and-get with Jamario Moon that was sheer poetry), and the drive.

So Cleveland gets homecourt advantage back, and the pressure is off of them. The momentum has now swung dramatically back in their direction. But a blowout of this proportion almost guarantees a Celtics response in Game 4. Each team now has a dominant win, and we’ve seen the best from both clubs. Where we go from here will determine the legacies of both of these teams and their leaders.

NBA: Kenneth Faried got away with foul on decisive basket in Nuggets’ win over Bulls

1 Comment

The Bulls’ biggest loss Friday was Jimmy Butler to injury. His absence certainly contributed to a loss to the Timberwolves the following night.

But Chicago also lost to the Nuggets on Friday, and perhaps that wouldn’t have happened if the game were called correctly down the stretch.

With Denver up two points and 21.1 seconds remaining, Kenneth Faried offensively rebounded a free throw and scored. The Bulls then intentionally fouled down the stretch, and Faried and Danilo Gallinari added a few free throws in the Nuggets’ 115-110 win.

One problem: Faried should’ve been called for offensively fouling Taj Gibson on the key putback, according to the NBA’s Last Two Minute Report:

Faried (DEN) extends his arm into Gibson (CHI) and dislodges him, affecting his ability to retrieve the rebound.

This was a huge swing. Instead of Taj Gibson – a 69% career free-throw shooter – going to the line for two attempts with Chicago down two points, Faried put the Nuggets up four. Even if Gibson split at the line, the Bulls would have been in significantly better shape.

As usual, we can’t know what would’ve happened if this call were made correctly. But it significantly set back Chicago.

NBA considering if jump-on-back foul should be flagrant foul

Leave a comment

The video above is an intentional foul — Chris Paul jumped on the back of Dwight Howard. The same thing has happened to Andre Drummond.

Is it a flagrant foul?

The Boston Celtics tweeted this out on Sunday.

The NBA was quick to let people know that this is just something under consideration — there has been no change in the rules. This may well be where the league is headed, but it’s not there yet.

The NBA defines a flagrant foul as “unnecessary contact committed by a player against an opponent.” To me, leaping on a player’s back like that qualifies. (A flagrant two foul is “unnecessary and excessive contact” and leads to an ejection; this is not that.)

Jared Dudley — one of the more vocal players on union issues — added a good point.

Consider this part of the coming changes on the intentional fouling rules period. But this one tweak could come much faster.

NBA: Foul on Cavaliers that sparked Celtics’ comeback called in error

Cleveland Cavaliers' J.R. Smith makes a move on Boston Celtics' Evan Turner (11) during the third quarter of a NBA basketball game in Boston Tuesday, Dec. 15, 2015. (AP Photo/Winslow Townson)
4 Comments

The Cavaliers were in great shape against the Celtics on Friday, leading by four points with seven seconds left.

Then, it all went so wrong for Cleveland.

J.R. Smith was called for fouling Evan Turner on a made layup, cutting the margin to two points. Turner missed the free throw, but the ball went out of bounds off the Cavs. Then, Avery Bradley made a buzzer-beating 3-pointer to give Boston the win.

Rewind, though, and an incorrect call drove the sequence, according to the NBA.

Smith shouldn’t have been called for fouling Turner, per the Last Two Minute Report:

Smith (CLE) makes incidental contact with Turner’s (BOS) body as he attempts the layup.

If this were officiated correctly, the Cavs would’ve had the ball and a two-point lead with 5.9 seconds left. That’s not a lock to win – they’d still have to inbound the ball and make their free throws – but it’s close.

Cleveland is definitely entitled to feel the refs wronged them out of a victory.

Report: Kevin Durant has “done his due diligence on the Bay Area”

4 Comments

Kevin Durant has not made up his mind about what he will do as a free agent this summer. Until his playoff run ends, whenever that may be for the Thunder, his focus will be on bringing a title to Oklahoma City.

But even he admits he can’t help but think about free agency a little.

The buzz around the league is Golden State is at the front of the line if Durant decides to leave OKC, and he has done some research, reports Marc Spears of Yahoo Sports.

The Warriors play in front of an intimidating Oracle Arena crowd and are expected to debut a new San Francisco arena in 2019. Durant has quietly done his due diligence on the Bay Area, too, sources told Yahoo Sports.

His people — specifically agent Rich Kleiman and personal manager Charlie Bell — would be stupid not to have done some research on not only Golden State but on every other team he might consider: Houston, Miami, Washington, both teams in Los Angeles, the Knicks, and on down the line. Golden State, playing with Stephen Curry, certainly would have its attractions.

I’m still in the camp that Durant signs a 1+1 deal to stay in Oklahoma City (meaning he can opt out after one more season, in 2017), and it’s all about the cash. While he could get 30 percent of a $90 million cap this summer (about $27 million a season to start), with one more year of service in 2017 Durant could get 35 percent of $108 million ($37.8 million to start). That’s a lot of cash. Plus he gets one more chance at a ring with Russell Westbrook and Serge Ibaka, who both are 2017 free agents.

But you can be sure whatever Durant decides, it will be well researched and thought out. And he’s not going to announce it in a live special on ESPN.