NBA Playoffs, Thunder Lakers Game 4: That's what you call an old fashioned beat down

27 Comments

Thumbnail image for Durant_dunk.jpgThis is exactly the kind of game you expect when the top seed Oklahoma City team gets those young, eighth seed Lakers on their home court. The better team wins big, runs them out of the building from the first tip. Just an old fashioned, no mercy beatdown.

Wait, what? The Lakers were the top seed? Really, because they didn’t look like it. The Thunder won 110-89 and the series now shifts back to LA tied 2-2. And with the Thunder having all the momentum.

It’s not that the Lakers didn’t have a plan — early in the game both Ron Artest and Kobe Bryant passed up wide-open threes to drive the paint. The Lakers worked very hard to get the ball inside to Pau Gasol and Andrew Bynum early — 13 of the first 16 Lakers shots came in the paint. They are bigger and they were going to exploit it.

But those were heavily contested shots. The Thunder are long and can afford to pack the paint when the Lakers are shooting just 18.2 percent from three (as they did this game). Remember the Lakers were 10 of 31 from three the game before. As it was for much of this season, there is no reason to fear the Lakers outside shooters. The Thunder are showing them no respect.

Kobe, meanwhile, looks human. He looks banged up. He tried to be the facilitator, not taking his first shot until nearly three minutes into the second quarter. He said afterward he was managing the game, trying to get others involved. Bottom line is that he had just 10 shots and 12 points on the night. Kobe Bryant did not — maybe could not — take over.

The Thunder also knew what they wanted to do to  — run. And they did. Off turnovers (although there weren’t many of those), off missed shots (there were plenty of those) and even off made shots. Russell Westbrook led the way. Oklahoma City knows that in the open court, the Lakers are no match for their athleticism, so they ran every last chance they got.

Oklahoma City had 24 fast break points to the Lakers two. The Thunder controlled the pace and the Lakers couldn’t do anything to stop it.

All that running led to fouls — the Thunder were 42 of 48 from the free throw line. The Lakers got there 28 times, but only hit 17 (60 percent).

Some Lakers fans will look at that free throw disparity talk about the refs, but the Thunder got to the line because they were the aggressor. They earned their trips to the line by attacking.

Can the Thunder run all over the Lakers again in game 5? Yes.  But look for the Lakers to do things that will slow the pace, like make a couple shots. They will have a plan. But executing that plan is something else entirely.

NBA: Kenneth Faried got away with foul on decisive basket in Nuggets’ win over Bulls

1 Comment

The Bulls’ biggest loss Friday was Jimmy Butler to injury. His absence certainly contributed to a loss to the Timberwolves the following night.

But Chicago also lost to the Nuggets on Friday, and perhaps that wouldn’t have happened if the game were called correctly down the stretch.

With Denver up two points and 21.1 seconds remaining, Kenneth Faried offensively rebounded a free throw and scored. The Bulls then intentionally fouled down the stretch, and Faried and Danilo Gallinari added a few free throws in the Nuggets’ 115-110 win.

One problem: Faried should’ve been called for offensively fouling Taj Gibson on the key putback, according to the NBA’s Last Two Minute Report:

Faried (DEN) extends his arm into Gibson (CHI) and dislodges him, affecting his ability to retrieve the rebound.

This was a huge swing. Instead of Taj Gibson – a 69% career free-throw shooter – going to the line for two attempts with Chicago down two points, Faried put the Nuggets up four. Even if Gibson split at the line, the Bulls would have been in significantly better shape.

As usual, we can’t know what would’ve happened if this call were made correctly. But it significantly set back Chicago.

NBA considering if jump-on-back foul should be flagrant foul

Leave a comment

The video above is an intentional foul — Chris Paul jumped on the back of Dwight Howard. The same thing has happened to Andre Drummond.

Is it a flagrant foul?

The Boston Celtics tweeted this out on Sunday.

The NBA was quick to let people know that this is just something under consideration — there has been no change in the rules. This may well be where the league is headed, but it’s not there yet.

The NBA defines a flagrant foul as “unnecessary contact committed by a player against an opponent.” To me, leaping on a player’s back like that qualifies. (A flagrant two foul is “unnecessary and excessive contact” and leads to an ejection; this is not that.)

Jared Dudley — one of the more vocal players on union issues — added a good point.

Consider this part of the coming changes on the intentional fouling rules period. But this one tweak could come much faster.

NBA: Foul on Cavaliers that sparked Celtics’ comeback called in error

Cleveland Cavaliers' J.R. Smith makes a move on Boston Celtics' Evan Turner (11) during the third quarter of a NBA basketball game in Boston Tuesday, Dec. 15, 2015. (AP Photo/Winslow Townson)
4 Comments

The Cavaliers were in great shape against the Celtics on Friday, leading by four points with seven seconds left.

Then, it all went so wrong for Cleveland.

J.R. Smith was called for fouling Evan Turner on a made layup, cutting the margin to two points. Turner missed the free throw, but the ball went out of bounds off the Cavs. Then, Avery Bradley made a buzzer-beating 3-pointer to give Boston the win.

Rewind, though, and an incorrect call drove the sequence, according to the NBA.

Smith shouldn’t have been called for fouling Turner, per the Last Two Minute Report:

Smith (CLE) makes incidental contact with Turner’s (BOS) body as he attempts the layup.

If this were officiated correctly, the Cavs would’ve had the ball and a two-point lead with 5.9 seconds left. That’s not a lock to win – they’d still have to inbound the ball and make their free throws – but it’s close.

Cleveland is definitely entitled to feel the refs wronged them out of a victory.

Report: Kevin Durant has “done his due diligence on the Bay Area”

3 Comments

Kevin Durant has not made up his mind about what he will do as a free agent this summer. Until his playoff run ends, whenever that may be for the Thunder, his focus will be on bringing a title to Oklahoma City.

But even he admits he can’t help but think about free agency a little.

The buzz around the league is Golden State is at the front of the line if Durant decides to leave OKC, and he has done some research, reports Marc Spears of Yahoo Sports.

The Warriors play in front of an intimidating Oracle Arena crowd and are expected to debut a new San Francisco arena in 2019. Durant has quietly done his due diligence on the Bay Area, too, sources told Yahoo Sports.

His people — specifically agent Rich Kleiman and personal manager Charlie Bell — would be stupid not to have done some research on not only Golden State but on every other team he might consider: Houston, Miami, Washington, both teams in Los Angeles, the Knicks, and on down the line. Golden State, playing with Stephen Curry, certainly would have its attractions.

I’m still in the camp that Durant signs a 1+1 deal to stay in Oklahoma City (meaning he can opt out after one more season, in 2017), and it’s all about the cash. While he could get 30 percent of a $90 million cap this summer (about $27 million a season to start), with one more year of service in 2017 Durant could get 35 percent of $108 million ($37.8 million to start). That’s a lot of cash. Plus he gets one more chance at a ring with Russell Westbrook and Serge Ibaka, who both are 2017 free agents.

But you can be sure whatever Durant decides, it will be well researched and thought out. And he’s not going to announce it in a live special on ESPN.