NBA Playoffs Blazers Suns Game 4: The vengeful return of Brandon Roy


The Blazers needed an emotional lift. Something to get their crowd back into the zone after a deflating Game 3. Something to give them just a little bit of a push at both ends. And Brandon Roy, out for two weeks following surgery to repair a torn miniscus, making an early return? That’ll do it.

Roy came in and played absolutely huge in limited minutes, while the Portland defense held the Suns to a season low, and just. Like. That. 96-87. Series tied 2-2.

This one’s starting to get a little tense. After Amar’e elbow last game, you had two flagrants called in this one. One was Jerryd Bayless, who played brilliantly with passion, but got too worked up in transition. The other? Channing Frye made a moderate swipe on a Nic Batum fastbreak and was called for what may be the weakest flagrant foul in the history of professional basketball?

And you know what? It wouldn’t have changed a thing.

The Rose Garden wasn’t going to let the Blazers lose this game. Brandon Roy wasn’t going to let the Blazers lose this game. Marcus Camby, knocking down mid-range J’s from 22 feet (where he’s a 47% shooter by the way) wasn’t going to let the Blazers lose this game. And LaMarcus Aldridge more than anyone wasn’t going to let the Blazers lose this game.

While Amar’e Stoudemire was working inside (26 points, 8-10 FTs), Aldridge was the scoring option the Blazers desperately needed. 31 points, and deadly from mid-range. And make no mistake, he wanted it defensively as well. 11 boards, often in traffic.

There was no great adjustment made by the Blazers, the Suns just struggled, Jason Richardson fell back to Earth and missed a lot of open looks, while Steve Nash had six turnovers, including two late (one leading to the Batum flagrant). Versus the first Blazers win, this wasn’t a matchup or strategy win, this was one fed on energy and willpower. The Blazers were fierce all over, led by their general back on the floor. And when Roy nailed a jumper late to push the lead back up to multiple possessions, it felt like something legendary, even Willis-Reed-esque.

(It should be noted that Roy’s injury was not that severe, that surgery was not that invasive, and that essentially he just came back a week earlier with doctor’s clearance. Dramatic, but not really Reed-esque. But still a great story.)

The Suns suddenly have gone from looking like they were in complete control of this series to facing a must-win in Phoenix in Game 5. A loss puts them at the brink of elimination going back to the Rose Garden. And the Suns don’t have anyone coming back from injury to get them a boost. They’re just going to have to execute and find a way.

Otherwise, Roy’s return will just be a warmup for Round 2.

Report: Rockets will try to sign Alessandro Gentile next summer

Alessandro Gentile, Paulius Jankunas
1 Comment

The Rockets tried signing Sergio Llull this summer, but he opted for a long-term extension with Real Madrid.

So, they’ll just turn to another player in their large chest of stashed draft picks – Alessandro Gentile.

Marc Stein of ESPN:

Gentile, who was selected No. 53 in the 2014, is a 22-year-old wing for Armani Milano. He’s a good scorer, but he primarily works from mid-range – an area the Rockets eschew. He can get to the rim in Europe, but his subpar athleticism might hinder him in the NBA.

If Gentile comes stateside, he’ll face a steep learning curve. But he’s young enough and talented enough that he could develop into a rotation player.

Report: Hawks co-owner made more money by exposing Danny Ferry’s Luol Deng comments

Michael Gearon, Bruce Levenson
Leave a comment

A terribly kept secret: Hawks co-owner Michael Gearon Jr. wanted to get rid of general manager Danny Ferry.

Many believe that’s why Gearon made such a big deal about Ferry’s pejorative “African” comment about Luol Deng – that Gearon was more concerned about ousting Ferry than showing real concern over racism.

Gearon had another, no less sinister, reason to raise concern over Ferry’s remarks.

Kevin Arnovitz and Brian Windhorst of ESPN:

While Gearon felt that Ferry, as he wrote in the June 2014 email to Levenson, “put the entire franchise in jeopardy,” Gearon also figured to benefit financially from a Sterling-esque fallout.

In the spring of 2014, Gearon was in the process of selling more of his interest in the team to Levenson and the partners he had sold to in September. The agreed-upon price for roughly a third of Gearon’s remaining shares valued the Hawks at approximately $450 million, according to reports from sources.

“We accept your offer to buy the remaining 31 million,” Gearon wrote in an email to Levenson on April 17, 2014. “Let me know next steps so we can keep this simple as you suggested without a bunch of lawyers and bankers.”

Approximately five weeks later — just a little more than a week before the fateful conference call — Steve Ballmer agreed to pay $2 billion for the Clippers, a record-smashing price that completely changed the assessed value of NBA franchises. Gearon firmly maintains he was acting out of the sincerity of his convictions to safeguard the franchise from the Sterling stench, but such a spectacle also allowed him to wiggle out of selling his shares at far below market value.

Gearon and his legal team later challenged the notion that the sell-down was bound by any sort of contractual obligation and that any papers were signed. Once the organization became involved in the investigation, the sale of the shares was postponed.

Arnovitz and Windhorst did an incredible amount of reporting here. I suggest you read the full piece, which includes much more background on the Gearon-Ferry rift.

Considering the Hawks sold for $850 million, Gearon definitely made more money than if he’d sold his shares at a $450 million valuation.

Did that motivate him? Probably, though it doesn’t have to be one or the other. Most likely, his actions were derived from at least three desires – making more money, ousting Ferry and combating racism. Parsing how much each contributed is much more difficult.

What Ferry said was racist, whether or not he was looking at more racism on the sheet of paper in front of him. His comments deserved punishment.

But if Gearon didn’t have incentive to use them for his own benefit, would we even know about them? How many other teams, with more functional front offices, would have kept similar remarks under wraps or just ignored them?