It was a no-win situation for Phoenix tonight. Lose, and they’re down 0-2 headed to the Rose Garden, facing a very real chance of being swept. Win, and they still can’t erase the poor performance they gave in Game 1. So the only real option is to win a no-decision by blowing the Blazers out of the water, off the map, into the void. And that’s exactly what they did.
You can point to Jason Richardson with 29 points on 16 shots. You can throw it at the feet of Steve Nash with 16 assists. But the real hero tonight for the Suns? Grant Hill. The old man came through in every possible way tonight, in what may have been the best performance of the last five years of his career.
Hill was 10-11 for 20 points, with 8 rebounds, a block, and zero turnovers. But his biggest contribution was in all the little ways that really changes a game. He contained Andre Miller, and when Miller did get by him, his team had man-help defense (gasp) to close things off. He drew charges. He brought consistency and confidence. He was a pro among amateurs on both sides of the ball.
Which is not to say that Steve Nash didn’t play brilliantly. It was one of those nights where Nash could get whatever pass he wanted. The Blazers just didn’t have it.
The Blazers likely don’t care. They got what they wanted, home court advantage back. The question will be how Nate McMillan adjusts to the adjustments of Gentry and what they do to free LaMarcus Aldridge, who was often swarmed high as soon as he got the ball. The Suns may not be a good defensive team, but they can get it done if they’re all locked in. Too bad for Phoenix they’re 1-1 in locked-in-ness in this series.
NBA: Foul on Cavaliers that sparked Celtics’ comeback called in error
Smith (CLE) makes incidental contact with Turner’s (BOS) body as he attempts the layup.
If this were officiated correctly, the Cavs would’ve had the ball and a two-point lead with 5.9 seconds left. That’s not a lock to win – they’d still have to inbound the ball and make their free throws – but it’s close.
Cleveland is definitely entitled to feel the refs wronged them out of a victory.
Report: Kevin Durant has “done his due diligence on the Bay Area”
Kevin Durant has not made up his mind about what he will do as a free agent this summer. Until his playoff run ends, whenever that may be for the Thunder, his focus will be on bringing a title to Oklahoma City.
But even he admits he can’t help but think about free agency a little.
The Warriors play in front of an intimidating Oracle Arena crowd and are expected to debut a new San Francisco arena in 2019. Durant has quietly done his due diligence on the Bay Area, too, sources told Yahoo Sports.
His people — specifically agent Rich Kleiman and personal manager Charlie Bell — would be stupid not to have done some research on not only Golden State but on every other team he might consider: Houston, Miami, Washington, both teams in Los Angeles, the Knicks, and on down the line. Golden State, playing with Stephen Curry, certainly would have its attractions.
I’m still in the camp that Durant signs a 1+1 deal to stay in Oklahoma City (meaning he can opt out after one more season, in 2017), and it’s all about the cash. While he could get 30 percent of a $90 million cap this summer (about $27 million a season to start), with one more year of service in 2017 Durant could get 35 percent of $108 million ($37.8 million to start). That’s a lot of cash. Plus he gets one more chance at a ring with Russell Westbrook and Serge Ibaka, who both are 2017 free agents.
But you can be sure whatever Durant decides, it will be well researched and thought out. And he’s not going to announce it in a live special on ESPN.
Byron Scott expected to start D’Angelo Russell after All-Star break, but hasn’t talked to him about it
When we talk about Lakers’ coach Byron Scott’s questioned player development skills with young players Julius Randle, Jordan Clarkson, and particularly D'Angelo Russell, it is his old-school lack of communication that comes into question. It’s what is different from what Gregg Popovich or Quin Snyder or other guys developing strong young players have done. From the outside (we’re not in practices/film sessions), we see Scott was not letting Russell play through mistakes — feeling that was rewarding bad behavior — but then not doing a good job communicating what the player is doing wrong.
Scott plans to start Russell after NBA All-Star weekend (Feb. 12-14). But Scott said the two have not talked about that issue.
“He’s not old enough for me to have a meeting and discuss, ‘What do you think?’” Scott said.
I would say you should have that meeting — it’s called a teachable moment. “What do you think? Well here is what I see that is different.”
Part of what is going on with Scott and Russell is the concern from some in the Lakers’ camp that Russell is a little too full of himself, that his ego is too big, and it could become a problem. So they are trying to take him down a peg. I would say that for a smart player — and Russell is that — the game is humbling and will take care of the ego issue. But you’ve got to give him run to develop him.
Play him, and then communicate with him. It’s a system that does worth with modern players.
Nikola Vucevic hits fade-away game winner for Magic against Hawks