Let’s face it, it’s a big-market league. The Celtics and Lakers have won over 30 championships. The Knicks are a huge moneymaker despite being an abomination to effective sports management. The Clippers are profitable, people. It’s pretty obvious that the big boys run the game.
There is a lot of discussion about revenue sharing adjustments in the upcoming CBA that could help out smaller markets, and at this point it’s a requisite adjustment. But if the idea is to try and replicate the success of the NFL, small-market teams are going to have to rely on strategies which both adjust to the financial realities of the league and harken back to proven paradigms.
For the latter, we look to Charlotte Bobcats blog Rufus on Fire. David Arnott illustrates the problems of previous ownership in Charlotte, both with George Shinn’s tenure in Carolina with the Hornets and Bob Johnson’s time with the Bobcats. The core of his argument is that both ownership groups have failed to do business “The Carolina Way.” Part of it is conforming to traditional values, but in a larger sense it’s built on a devotion to the community.
San Antonio thinks of itself in terms of Texas, the Rodeo, a fine system of shopping centers, and the San Antonio Spurs. The Spurs are an institution there. Similarly, the Pacers have the same presence, though it’s a lot more effective when they don’t suck so bad they make you go blind. Building a community presence gives you traction with sponsors beyond the seasons where the team is competing for playoffs.
The other component is covered in Chris Mannix’s excellent interview with Milwaukee Bucks’ general manager John Hammond. Hammond talks about the financial realities of operating in Milwaukee and his work to essentially untie the franchise of the long-term commitments it was saddled with upon his arrival. The Bucks are looking to 2011, not 2010 as the year they can make a significant move towards contention. What’s interesting is that will likely also be after the prolonged lockout we’ve all resigned ourselves to. Which means the Bucks would end up with high flexibility in a different operating environment.
Operating an NBA team in a small-market is often met with derision and the constant suggestions that the team move (“Why don’t the Grizzlies just move to Seattle even though they have an ironclad lease with FedEx Forum that almost completely removes any realistic probability of them moving? It’s so easy!”). But there are ways to be successful, if the team looks to how other teams have thrived in such places while also adapting to the new economic environments.
Gordon Hayward is going to have surgery on his ankle and leg, which should not be a surprise to anyone who saw the gruesome injury to his leg just 5:15 into his Celtics career. There is no timetable for his return yet, maybe he makes it back for the playoffs, but the Celtics are not going to rush him and he may well miss the entire season.
What next for Boston?
In this PBT Extra I cover the three things to watch for from Boston, which in the short term could mean the Kyrie Irving show. Longer term, not much changes.
Gordon Hayward broke his leg early in his Celtics debut – a devastating injury. He’s preparing for surgery tonight, per Jeff Goodman of ESPN:
First – after a perfect introduction from Marcus Smart – Hayward addressed the Boston crowd from his hospital bed before tonight’s game against the Bucks.
What’s up everybody? Just wanted to say thank you to everyone who has sent me your thoughts and prayers. I’m going to be alright. It’s hurting me that I can’t be there for the home opener. I want nothing more just to be with my teammates and walk out onto that floor tonight. But I’ll be supporting you guys from here and wishing you the best of luck. Kill it tonight. Thanks, guys.
At least this nice moment (and an outpouring of support) came out of such a gruesome injury.
And if Smart keeps setting up his teammates so well, maybe the Celtics’ offense will keep humming.
Joel Embiid‘s minute limit of below 20 bummed out everyone (especially Embiid).
But good news could be on the way.
Keith Pompey of The Inquirer:
The 76ers look like a borderline playoff team, Embiid’s health the biggest variable. There’s a direct correlation between his ability to stay on the court and Philadelphia’s postseason chances.
Plus, he’s just so darn fun to watch. The more he plays, the bigger victory it is for every viewer not rooting for the 76ers’ opponent that night.
John Henson was on the trade block. Greg Monroe seems permanently affixed there.
Another player the Bucks apparently want to deal? Rashad Vaughn, who was the No. 17 pick in 2015.
Adrian Wojnarowski of ESPN:
Milwaukee has been working to trade several players to clear salary-cap space, including guard Rashad Vaughn and center John Henson, league sources said. The Bucks have been willing to attach a second-round pick in offers for Vaughn, league sources said.
It’s unclear whether the Bucks are still as motivated to move Vaughn. They slid under the luxury-tax line by stretching Spencer Hawes. One-time target Richard Jefferson already signed with the Nuggets. A roster vacancy and cap savings might not matter as much anymore to Milwaukee.
But Vaughn has struggled in two NBA seasons. The Bucks might be better off trying to develop someone else, even a D-League player, over the 21-year-old Vaugh.
Vaughn is due $1,889,040 this season. He faces a $2,901,565 team option for next season, which his team must decide on by Oct. 31. It seems unlikely that will be exercised.
This is what happens when you draft players for the wrong reason.