Who should the Grizzlies have drafted?

1 Comment

Behind every disastrous NBA draft selection there’s usually some solid logic at work. Detroit already had Tayshaun Prince at small forward, and were such a good team that a long-term prospect made more sense than a guy who would provide an immediate impact. When Atlanta drafted Marvin Williams over Chris Paul, plenty of reputable experts thought that Marvin had more potential than CP3. Portland had Clyde Drexler at shooting guard when they passed on Michael Jordan. 

The Grizzlies’ recent demotion of #2 overall pick Hasheem Thabeet to the D-League has led many to declare the pick a bust already. I think it’s a little too early to completely give up on Thabeet’s career, because he does have some serious size and athletic ability. However, with how ineffective Thabeet has been and how good some of his fellow rookies have been, now might be a good time to examine what some of Memphis’ other options may have been. 
James Harden:

This is a pick Memphis was almost certainly not going to make. Harden is a very talented young player. He’s been great off the bench for the upstart Thunder, and will only get better as he improves his ability to finish at the rim. However, two of Grizzlies’ best young players are O.J. Mayo and Rudy Gay. Mayo is a shooting guard and Gay is a small forward, which are Harden’s two natural positions. He’s perfect providing a rest for Kevin Durant and a change of pace from the offensively limited Thabo Sefolosha in Oklahoma City, but Memphis may have had trouble finding minutes for him.
Tyreke Evans: 

In my opinion, this pick would have been a home run for the Grizzlies. They may have been concerned about Evans’ ability to be a true point guard and play next to O.J. Mayo. Evans’ passing skills have been better than advertised in the NBA, and I’m a big fan of putting two combo guards next to each other. Mayo’s assist ratio isn’t great, but he has the ability to make plays from the shooting guard spot and could’ve complimented Evans’ scoring ability nicely. Also, Evans going into the paint and setting Mayo up with open looks could’ve made for an absolutely punishing backcourt tandem. 
Ricky Rubio:

Rubio is a pure point guard, a good defender, and would’ve had a Spanish teammate in Marc Gasol. However, there were some reports that Rubio would not have come to Memphis if the Grizzlies drafted him. Since he made good on his threats to the Timberwolves, it might be best to give the Grizzlies the benefit of the doubt for not drafting Rubio. Rubio could’ve been a good fit, but it may be a moot point. 
Jonny Flynn:

Flynn has been solid for the Timberwolves, but the Syracuse product has yet to blow the doors off the NBA. Mike Conley Jr. hasn’t been great so far in his NBA career. However, Greg Oden’s former running mate is still only 22 years old, and isn’t that far removed from being a #4 overall pick himself. The Grizzlies may have been hesitant to give up on Conley for anyone they weren’t in love with, especially after they traded Kyle Lowry at last year’s trade deadline. 
Stephen Curry:

Curry has show excellent playmaking and scoring skills in Golden State, and has been one of the few bright spots in Golden State’s miserable season. He has one of the NBA’s purest strokes, and shows an understanding of the game well beyond his years in the league. The Timberwolves may have been wary of pairing him with O.J. Mayo, another scoring guard who likes the ball in his hands. They apparently aren’t the only team with misgivings about pairing Mayo and Curry, as the Warriors apparently denied a trade that would have given them both O.J. Mayo and Thabeet for Monta Ellis. I’m not sure why teams think Curry couldn’t work next to Mayo (on a team, not a sandwich); if Curry can thrive next to the black hole that is Monta Ellis, he can play with anybody. 
High draft picks have been known to surprise fans after slow starts to their NBA career. But with how well some of the rookie guards have been playing, Memphis has to be seriously questioning whether going big was the right move on draft night. 

Rumor: Lakers would fire Byron Scott for Luke Walton

Golden State Warriors interim coach Luke Walton, left, walks off the court with Los Angeles Lakers guard Kobe Bryant after an NBA basketball game in Oakland, Calif., Tuesday, Nov. 24, 2015. The Warriors won 111-77. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)
AP Photo/Jeff Chiu
Leave a comment

The Lakers reportedly view the rest of the season as a tryout for Byron Scott.

Unless Warriors assistant Luke Walton wants the job. Then, Scott is out.

So says a notable Lakers rumormonger.

Stephen A. Smith on ESPN LA on Scott:

I’m hearing he’s gone if Luke Walton wants to come in and take the job next season, that if he wants to do that, that obviously they would move beyond the Byron Scott era and bring in Luke Walton, that Luke Walton, however, as much as he loves the Lakers and California, may not find that to be an attractive job unless they position themselves to acquire somebody like a Ben Simmons. That is what I have heard.

I have also heard that it’s very, very possible that Jeanie Buss is going to keep her word and fire her brother Jim Buss – thank the good lord – and that Mitch Kupchak may very well not be safe as well.

How definitive that is remains to be seen. But that is the chatter in NBA circles.

Walton played for the Lakers, and Kobe Bryant still respects him. Though Kobe will retire after the season, his endorsement could still carry weight – especially as it speaks to players’ perception of Walton.

The Golden State assistant impressed while filling in for Steve Kerr as acting head coach. He has already been linked to the Knicks and Suns, and he could get other offers.

If the Lakers keep their top-three-protected first-round pick, they’d have an intriguing job with D'Angelo Russell, Julius Randle, a promising rookie, matching rights for Arenas-provision-limited Jordan Clarkson and tons of cap space. If the Lakers lose their pick, the job would look a lot worse. Either way, staying in California and leading one of the NBA’s premier franchises could appeal to Walton.

It’s this interest that makes me believe Scott’s “tryout” is little more than a courtesy for a former player who helped the Lakers win championships. If they’d fire Scott for Walton, how many other replacements would warrant dumping Scott? My list would be long enough to ensure he gets canned.

As far as Jim Buss, his deadline for turning around the team or losing his job has been a source of contention. But even Jeannie, who gives him less time than he gives himself, said he had until the summer of 2017.

Lakers fans might have to settle for exercising one one of their demons.

Report: Luke Walton and Brian Shaw top Knicks’ candidates to replace Derek Fisher

LOS ANGELES, CA - JUNE 06:  (L-R) Assistant coach Brian Shaw, head coach Phil Jackson and assistant coach Frank Hamblen of the Los Angeles Lakers sit on the bench in the second half against the Boston Celtics Game Two of the 2010 NBA Finals at Staples Center on June 6, 2010 in Los Angeles, California. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement  (Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images)
Getty Images
4 Comments

Out: Derek Fisher.

In: Kurt Rambis.

That’s only the first step of the Knicks’ coaching change.

Brian Windhorst of ESPN:

Of course, Luke Walton and Brian Shaw – like Fisher and the other top candidate in 2014, Steve Kerr – played for Phil Jackson. The Knicks president has a type, one that includes both good and bad candidates.

The good: Walton. He impressed with his handling of the Warriors in Steve Kerr’s absence. He’s one of the hottest coaches on the market. I have some doubts, given Kerr’s and Golden State’s players’ influence. But Walton has done plenty right to be in this position.

The bad: Shaw. Jackson reportedly preferred Shaw to Fisher two years ago, but Shaw was under contract with the Nuggets. Denver since fired him, because he did a stunningly awful job connecting with his players. Perhaps, he has grown in that area since, though.

It seems inevitable Tom Thibodeau’s name will come up. The former Bulls coach isn’t a Phil Jackson disciple, but he previously worked as a Knicks assistant. Maybe his New York connection will allow Thibodeau to overcome his lack of a Jackson tie.

A direct connection to Jackson clearly puts someone on the fast track for this job.

Knicks fire Derek Fisher

New York Knicks coach Derek Fisher reacts during the second half of the team's NBA basketball game against the Boston Celtics at Madison Square Garden in New York, Tuesday, Jan. 12, 2016. The Knicks defeated the Celtics 120-114. (AP Photo/Kathy Willens)
(AP Photo/Kathy Willens
3 Comments

There were rumors about the Knicks firing Derek Fisher – and that was before New York lost 9-of-10.

Now, with the Knicks sinking out of the playoff picture, they’ve made a move.

Fisher was one of the NBA’s most improved coaches – which mostly speaks to how lousy of a job he did last year. But that was also his first season coaching in any capacity. If you’re going to hire someone so inexperienced, doesn’t it also make sense to give him time to learn on the job? And if progresses at a reasonable rate, doesn’t it make sense to allow him to continue to grow?

If the Knicks are firing Fisher now, he was probably doomed from the start.

There are plenty of reasons not to believe in Fisher, including his Xs and Os and refusal to see motivating his players as part of his job. But the Knicks did believe in him. They hired him. It’s difficult to see why they reversed course so quickly.

Especially to Kurt Rambis. Although he is just an interim, they will make another hire this summer.

Rambis went 15-67 and 17-65 in an ugly two-year stint coaching the Timberwolves. He probably won’t lift the 23-31 Knicks back into playoff contention this season.

Perhaps, that speaks to just how fed up the Knicks were with Fisher.

NBA: Grizzlies deserved another shot to beat Mavericks in regulation of OT loss

1 Comment

The NBA tweeted the Grizzlies beat the Mavericks on Saturday.

A mistake, yes. Dallas won the game, 114-110, in overtime.

But the tweet also could’ve reflected an alternate reality where the game were called correctly down the stretch.

The Mavericks had two cracks to win in regulation – a Dirk Nowitzki jumper and, after a Zach Randolph loose-ball foul going for the rebound, a lob to Justin Anderson. Neither connected, though neither should have even been attempted.

Nowitzki got away with travelling before his shot at the 5.2-second mark, according to the Last Two Minute Report:

Nowitzki (DAL) moves his pivot foot. The official is looking for any potential illegal contact and does not pick up the pivot foot.

The league also ruled Marc Gasol should’ve been called for fouling Nowitzki on the shot. But the travel came first, which would’ve made the foul irrelevant.

It’s obviously no guarantee the Grizzlies would’ve scored, but 5.2 seconds would’ve been plenty of time to get off a decent attempt. They deserved the opportunity.

At least the Mavericks earned the win in overtime. All three missed calls in the extra period worked against them. The NBA ruled two shooting fouls on Dallas – Nowitzki fouling Jeff Green with 2:07 left and Raymond Felton fouling Mike Conley with 6.5 seconds left – were errors. Those gave Memphis an extra two points on free throws. Gasol also got away with an offensive foul with 1:43 left, though the Grizzlies didn’t score on that possession anyway.