It’s a big show in Dallas — more than 90,000 people, high flying stars, a dunk contest the night before, no expense spared for the NBA’s biggest weekend.
Ignore that dark cloud over the proceedings.
Today in frigid Dallas (well, for Dallas), the owners and players representatives will sit down for their first talks on a new NBA collective bargaining agreement (CBA). The owners have the option to opt out of the current CBA by the end of the year and are expected to do so, meaning the teams have until the start of the 2011-12 season to strike a deal.
In its first proposal the owners skipped the shot across the bow and went right for the middle of the hull.
A person who has seen the document tells The Associated Press that first-round picks would have their salaries cut by about one-third and the minimum salary would be reduced by as much as 20 percent. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment publicly about the negotiations.
The total value of a maximum contract also would drop significantly.
According to other reports, the proposal calls for all deals — including already negotiated ones — to have to be scaled back to the new levels. That means that the massive deal LeBron James and Dwyane Wade get this summer would be cut back after a year to fit under the new CBA. The owners are clearly using the current economy to get back things they wanted from previous negotiations, when they didn’t have the leverage of money loss on their side.
That’s the kind of thing that could lead to an eventual lockout.
It’s the first proposal of a negotiation, so the owners have done the right thing in asking for everything so they can give some things back over the course of the talks and still get what they want. In a speech Thursday NBA Commissioner David Stern said that he expected the two sides would come together because it was in their mutual interests to do.
But he also said to be ready for a long negotiation.
The Lakers might not even have a first-round pick this year.
Thanks to the ill-fated Steve Nash sign-and-trade, the Lakers owe the 76ers (via the Suns) a top-three-protected first-rounder. As the No. 2 seed in the lottery, the Lakers have just better than a coin-flip chance of landing in the top three and keeping the pick.
But if the Lakers land the top selection, they might not engage in the Ben Simmons-or-Brandon Ingram debate.
Colin Cowherd of Fox Sports:
Is this a good idea? The answer, as usual, is it depends on what they could get.
There’s a logic to adding another young player whose peak would align with Lakers’ core. D'Angelo Russell (20), Julius Randle (21) and Jordan Clarkson (23) aren’t ready to win. It might be better to add someone who will enter his prime when they do.
But the Lakers’ market and prestige make them a popular free-agent destination, and free agents value winning. Moderate improvements that would stick many teams on the mediocrity treadmill could open the door for the Lakers signing a star.
The Lakers should weigh these factors and trade offers logically and decide what to do if they get a top pick.
Of course, there are other factors. Jim Buss faces a somewhat-self-imposed deadline for contending. To the person in charge, what’s best for the franchise’s long-term outlook might not matter as much as a potential quick fix.
How tall is Kevin Durant?
He’s listed at 6-foot-9, but his teammates have guessed everything from 6-foot-10 to 7-foot-3.
Durant, via Chris Herring of The Wall Street Journal:
“For me, when I’m talking to women, I’m 7 feet,” he said. “In basketball circles, I’m 6-9.”
“But really, I’ve always thought it was cool to say I’m a 6-9 small forward,” he said. “Really, that’s the prototypical size for a small forward. Anything taller than that, and they’ll start saying, ‘Ah, he’s a power forward.’ ”
This mirrors Kevin Garnett, who Flip Saunders once called “6-foot-13” because Garnett didn’t want to get pigeonholed as a center.
But most height fudging in the NBA has players trying to be listed as taller. Read Herring’s piece for a fun look at the hijinks.
The Heat haven’t gotten past the Raptors. The Cavaliers haven’t toppled the Hawks, for that matter.
But can you imagine a Cleveland-Miami conference finals?
LeBron James can.
LeBron, via Joe Vardon of Cleveland.com:
“I think naturally of course. That’s since I’ve came back,” James said. “It’d be great to play against those guys in the postseason. Throughout my whole career, I’ve always wanted to go against (Dwyane) Wade in a playoff series. We’ve always talked about it even before we became teammates in ’10. It’s not been heavy on my mind but it’s crossed my mind throughout my whole career.”
LeBron doesn’t realize how bad of an idea this is, which is what makes it such a bad idea.
It isn’t that the Heat are playing better than Toronto right now – though they are. It isn’t that the Heat are a tougher matchup for Cleveland than Toronto – though they are, routing the Cavs twice in three regular-season games (one of which LeBron didn’t play).
It’s that facing the Heat would bring a ridiculous level of drama to the series, and LeBron’s teammates are more equipped to face the Raptors and the fewer distractions that would come with that matchup.
LeBron just wants to be on the court with his friend, Dwyane Wade – with him or against him. I think LeBron can handle that, enjoy that and still produce.
But it undermines his teammate’s focus when LeBron does something like chat with Wade during halftime when they’re trying to prepare for the second half. It can bother teammates when even more attention than usual is placed on LeBron, who’d be THE storyline in a matchup with his old team.
If the Cavs had a choice – and they obviously don’t – they should avoid all that.
But the way the teams are playing, LeBron will probably get his wish.
Seattle Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson had a dumb idea about the Sonics.
So, he posted it to Twitter:
Yes, because this is how the NBA decides where to place teams.
Seattle’s City Council voted not to sell part of a street to Chris Hansen, essentially blocking a new arena – which is probably for the best. Why build a stadium when you might not even get a team? NBA commissioner Adam Silver says the league isn’t expanding anytime soon, and no franchise appears imminent to move.
But a petition could change all that do nothing – except rile up Wilson’s fans, no matter how detached the idea is from reality.